1.26.2010

Ladies and Gentlemen!


Testing 1, 2, 3. Mike check. Hello? Testing.  <* clears throat *>
Ladies and Gentlemen! Your education has certainly suffered during the past 8 years. But I'm here to change that.... bringing what's called NEW MATH to Washington, where 4 million lost jobs equals a gain of 2 million (saved or created, or saved, or created, or created/saved), where taxes raised on health care, cigarettes, and the repealing of the Bush tax cuts equals a tax break on the middle class. Where thousands of government employees now making for the first time over $175k equals cutting back and reducing the deficit, while the debt ceiling has been raised (hallelujah) to over 14 trillion. And did I mention that bankers (one industry making a profit) are evil?

2 3 4

I’m gonna blame Bush forever, forever & ever amen
As long as old men sit & talk about the weather
As long as old women sit & talk about old men
If you wonder how long I’ll be blaming him
I’ll be happy to tell you again
I'm gonna blame Bush, forever & ever, forever & ever amen

You may think that I’m acting foolish
You’ve heard that I’m new & I’m green
You may wonder how I can promise you now
We’ll spend a trillion dollars while we still owe three
And it’s not my blood that is spilling
When I give up memos of the CIA
It’s not my money that I will be spending
On every left-wing program that enters my brain

one more time

I’m gonna blame Bush forever, forever & ever amen
As long as old men sit & talk about the weather
As long as old women sit & talk about old men
If you wonder how long I’ll be blaming him
I’ll be happy to tell you again
I'm gonna blame Bush, forever & ever, forever & ever amen


Okay - are we done here? Can we just let the computer deliver the speech next time? All the words are in there already, so why do I have to actually speak them? I'll form a committee to look into that. Thank you very much.

1.23.2010

Recklessly Courting Disaster

"You should not be reading this book. I should not have been able to write it."

Courting Disaster by Marc A. Thiessen

Few know more about these CIA operations than Thiessen, and in his new book, Courting Disaster, he documents just how effective the CIA’s interrogations were in foiling attacks on America, penetrating al-Qaeda’s high command, and providing our military with actionable intelligence. Thiessen also shows how reckless President Obama has been in shutting down the CIA’s program and releasing secret documents that have aided our enemies.

1.22.2010

Score One for the First Amendment

here are a couple of excerpts from today's ruling that makes ridiculous Government intervention to trample free speech seem silly. Schumer, and Obama, they'll disagree loudly:“It’s poisonous. It’s poisonous to our democracy,” Schumer said. “This threatens the viability of our democracy.”

But those who support Democrats look carefully... these politicians want to prohibit free speech, except from those organizations they deem fit. Free Speech is for everybody! Even corporations (oh my!).

My excerpts:

If the First Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congress from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens, for simply engaging in political speech. If the antidistortion rationale were to be accepted, however, it would permit Government to ban political speech simply because the speaker is an association that has taken on the corporate form. The Government contends that Austin permits it to ban corporate expenditures for almost all forms of communication stemming from a corporation. See Part II-E, supra; Tr. of Oral Arg. 66 (Sept. 9, 2009); see also id., at 26-31 (Mar. 24, 2009). If Austin were correct, the Government could prohibit a corporation from expressing political views in media beyond those presented here, such as by printing books. The Government responds "that the FEC has never applied this statute to abook," and if it did, "there would be quite [a] good as-applied challenge." Tr. of Oral Arg. 65 (Sept. 9, 2009). This troubling assertion of brooding governmental power cannot be reconciled with the confidence and stability in civic discourse that the First Amendment must secure.

Political speech is "indispensable to decisionmaking in a democracy, and this is no less true because the speech comes from a corporation rather than an individual." pg 33


###

The law's exception for media corporations is, on its own terms, all but an admission of the invalidity of the antidistortion rationale. And the exemption results in a further, separate reason for finding this law invalid: Again by its own terms, the law exempts some corporations but covers others, even though both have the need or the motive to communicate their views. The exemption applies to media corporations owned or controlled by corporations that have diverse and substantial investments and participate in endeavors other than news. So even assuming the most doubtful proposition that a news organization has a right to speak when others do not, the exemption would allow a conglomerate that owns both a media business and an unrelated business to influence or control the media in order to advance its overall business interest. At the same time, some other corporation, with an identical business interest but no media outlet in its ownership structure, would be forbidden to speak or inform the public about the same issue. This differential treatment cannot be squaredwith the First Amendment. pg 36


to learn more:
http://bigjournalism.com/fross/2010/01/21/supreme-court-drop-kicks-mccainfeingold-scores-victory-for-1st-amendment/

1.20.2010

Obama Spin of the Decade

President Obama said today that the anger that elected Brown is the same anger that elected him.

"Here's my assessment of not just the vote in Massachusetts, but the mood around the country: the same thing that swept Scott Brown into office swept me into office," the president said in an exclusive interview with ABC News' George Stephanopoulos. "People are angry and they are frustrated. Not just because of what's happened in the last year or two years, but what's happened over the last eight years." LINK

And we know that "the past 8 years" is code for anti-Bush... think post-hypnotic suggestion, and triggered response, etc. This has to be the spin of the year (and there have been so many)... to tie the Brown victory into the same anti-Bush sentiment that got Obama elected. Bravo. Another great day for creative writing. In other words, Obama is just like Brown. The people's man. Never mind the fact that he was there campaigning for Coakley, and that Brown stands in opposition to Obamacare etc.

Also, may I say that simply voting for Brown doesn't indicate anger, or frustration. Could be that many people were voting calmly and in peace out of happiness to finally have someone to vote for who gets it. Would the same be said if most voted for Coakley? Would that be out of anger and frustration? Those that vote Republican are called "angry." More spin.

1.19.2010

Coakley Polls

Main Stream Media Spin alert: if Scott Brown wins tonight, be assured that it'll be all about how Martha Coakley ran a poor race... in fact it has already been set up that way, despite the fact that her liberal speech is indistinguishable from any other Democrat in the Senate. And it will not have anything to do with Scott Brown and his talent in winning the debate and connecting with the actual people he hopes to represent.

Amazing but true, the media misses the mark in Boston. However, one can't forget the old "this election was stolen" angle. In case of a loss, don't accept the results.
“We have seen a number of disturbing incidents this evening that have called into question the integrity of this election,” Coakley campaign manager Kevin Conroy said.
That'll take at least 6 weeks to sort out, eh? And then magically, Coakley, just like Pat Paulsen... er, Al Franken, will end up on top.

1.17.2010

Democratic Translation of Limbaugh's CPAC Speech now available

originally posted Tuesday, March 3, 2009 at 2:35PM by me on a different blog

When Rush Limbaugh took off last Saturday on a passionate CPAC speech that laid out conservative principles, and explained many of the steps to take to build a strong future for the Republican party, I couldn't help thinking that if a Democrat were listening, they might be thinking "what the heck is this guy even talking about?" since many of the ideas of reducing the size of government, cutting taxes to help jump start an economic recovery, and personal freedoms through less government regulation, must have sounded like a foreign language to any liberals listening at the time. Fortunately, now that a few days have passed, the thinkers on the left have translated Rush's CPAC speech for easier consumption.

Here are a few excerpts from the speech with a good explanation, from a liberal viewpoint, of what the man was getting at:

1. We believe that a person can be the best he or she wants to be if certain things are just removed from their path like onerous taxes, regulations and too much government.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

2. You know what the cliche is, a conservative: racist, sexist, bigot, homophobe. Excuse me, ladies and gentlemen of America. If you were paying attention, I know you were, the racism in our culture was exclusively and fully on display in the Democrat primary last year.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

3. We want the country to succeed, and for the country to succeed, its people -- its individuals -- must succeed. Everyone among us must be pursuing his ambition or her desire, whatever, with excellence. Trying to be the best they can be. Not told, as they are told by the Democrat Party: You really can't do that, you don't have what it takes, besides you're a minority or you're a woman and there are too many people that want to discriminate against you. You can't get anywhere. You need to depend on us.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

4. Now, let me speak about President Obama for just a second. President Obama is one of the most gifted politicians, one of the most gifted men that I have ever witnessed. He has extraordinary talents. He has communication skills that hardly anyone can surpass. No, seriously. No, no, I'm being very serious about this. It just breaks my heart that he does not use these extraordinary talents and gifts to motivate and inspire the American people to be the best they can be. He's doing just the opposite. And it's a shame.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

5. The freedom we spoke of earlier is the freedom, it's the ambition, it's the desire, the wherewithal, the passions that people have that gave us the great entrepreneurial advances, the great inventions, the greatest food production, the human lifestyle advances in this country. Why shouldn't that be rewarded? Why is that now the focus of punishment?

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

6. Ladies and gentlemen, there ought not be any poverty except those who are genuinely ill equipped. But most of the people in poverty in this country are equipped for far much more. They've just been beaten down. They're told don't worry, we'll take care of you. There's nothing out there for you anyway; you'll be discriminated against.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.

7. Spending a nation into generational debt is not an act of compassion. All politicians, including President Obama, are temporary stewards of this nation. It is not their task to remake the founding of this country. It is not their task to tear it apart and rebuild it in their image.

DEMOCRATIC TRANSLATION: Rush Limbaugh said that he wants Obama to fail.


Etc. etc. you get the drift. Rush Limbaugh was, as they say, en fuego at CPAC, and you can get the whole transcript and see video of the speech online on Rush's Web site. The point I'm trying to make is that people on the left should be insulted by the way their leaders have tried to take what was a profound speech, a thinking person's speech, and boil it all down for their constituents into a talking point. The fact is that they assume you, the average Democratic voter, will not actually read the transcript for yourself. You won't read it, ponder it, and draw your own conclusions, no, you'll agree that Rush Limbaugh had the audacity to pray for Obama to fail.

CBS News obliges the administration by reporting on Rahm Emanuel's Face The Nation appearance using the headline: Emanuel: Rush Prays For Obama's Failure.

I ask Democrats of this country to stop for a moment and realize what is happening. Your administration is assuming that you'll swallow this blue pill of a summary of the Limbaugh speech. They know that Limbaugh is a caricature in many ways and can be easily, mindlessly dismissed by people who have already made up their minds. If you think back a few months, you were sold Obama in much the same way. Don't think about it too deeply... just believe. I'm asking you - don't let your leaders insult you like this! Be smart enough, at least, to read and analyze the CPAC speech, and decide ... for ... your ... self.  Read some books by conservative thinkers and then explain your positions. You don't think we're headed towards Socialism? Good for you... then explain how the Federal defecit increased 300% in Obama's first 6 weeks in office, and we're just getting warmed up. Let's reason together. You don't like Ann Coulter? Mark Levin? Try reading a book by either author, ingesting it, and then defend your position. Don't just take the blue pill and accept what everybody says. It's like being in high school all over again. You know how some people are considered to be really cool and they turn out to be jerks, and others are considered geeky and they turn out to be Bill Gates? Look deeper.

12.24.2009

The Huge Elephant in the Room

Government health care... a huge elephant. The tail: Lip service to the 3 things people actually do want changed (affordability, pre-existing loopholes, and portability), plus willful ignorance of several items that actually could help achieve those 3 things (interstate competition, tort reform, actual portability). Then the elephant itself is massive government control and taxation in order to forever say that anyone who doesn't support the elephant, doesn't care about people. Meanwhile Democrats say "today we have helped a great many people." Dream on.

My favorite quote from this debacle (back when this bill was 1,000 pages and not 2,000): The only reason to have a 1,000 page bill is so you can hide things in it.

I would only ask, today, this day of turning our precious country over to Socialism for good, to take a good look around, those of you who "Rocked the Vote" and those who bought into the Bush bashing hype of Obama and his ilk, and even foolishly believed he was a pragmatist (some even do to this day!); take a good look and see what has been done.

You have willfully elected a smooth-talking Marxist into the highest office, who wasted NO time in appointing the likes of Valerie Jarrett (that devoted follower of Van Jones), Anita Dunn who relied on Jon Stewart and Mao Tse Tung a bit too much and seethed against FOX News, her chosen enemy to blame, Rahm Emanuel, Kevin Jennings, and on and on.

Breathe it in, folks. See what has happened... witness it, and own up to it. And if you wanted America to renounce Capitalism the way it has, and to take over businesses, and appoint a record number of czars positioned to circumvent traditional houses of government, then well done. You have succeeded. This must be a great day for you. But if you now realize that just maybe you were deceived by a large political movement that outspent their opponents 4 to 1 for the media to get elected, then now is the time to rock OUT the vote. People still have power at the polls.

Perhaps you now realize that a rock star may look cool, and/or sound cool, but is clueless when it comes to creating jobs, balancing a budget, or crafting a political system other than Communism. Hate to break it to you, but many rock stars are not even that good at making music either, as far as this jazzer is concerned. And did it ever occur to you that voting for what the rock star seems to want might be the worst thing for our country? And if the country fails, where does that leave you?

I want to recommend watching the HBO series John Adams. See what sacrifice people went through to give birth to this country. When the decision had to be made to stand up against the British Army and Navy, it literally did mean Liberty or Death. Would you now so casually cast it all away?

Rock the Vote nimrods:

Adrian Grenier
Against Me!
American Bang
Anthony Hamilton
Armor For Sleep
Army Navy
Ashanti
Avenged Sevenfold
Beastie Boys
Ben Harper
Ben Jelen
Beyonce
Big Boi
Bishop Lamont
Blink-182
Brett Dennon
Bun B
Chester French
Christina Aguilera
Coldplay
David Banner
Dilated Peoples
DJ Skee
Eric Hutchinson
Fall Out Boy
Filter
Flobots
Good Charlotte
Green Day
Greg Laswell
Gym Class Heroes
Hanson
Hawthorne Heights
Idina Menzel
J.DaVey
Jack Johnson
Jack's Mannequin
Jakob Dylan
Janeane Garofalo
Janelle Monae
   

Jason Mraz
John Forte
John Legend
John Rich
Josh Groban
Juanes
Junkie XL
K’NAAN
Katy Perry
Kenna
Keri Hilson
Kid Cudi
Kid Sister
Kidz in the Hall
Lenny Kravitz
Lil Jon
Lil Romeo
Madonna
Mark Ronson
Maroon 5
Michael Franti & Spearhead
Michelle Branch
Monte Negro
MoZella
Murs
MXPX
My Chemical Romance
My Morning Jacket
Mya
NERD
Nick Cannon
Norah Jones
Paulina Rubio
Pete Wentz
Pharrel Williams
Regina Spektor
Rise Against
Runner Runner
Samantha Ronson
Santigold
   

Saul Williams
Scott Weiland
Senses Fail
Sheryl Crow
Shwayze
Solange Knowles
Soulja Boy
Spank Rock
Story of the Year
Street Sweeper Social Club
Talib Kweli
Tegan & Sara
The All-American Rejects
The Black Eyed Peas
The Black Keys
The Cool Kids
The Crystal Method
The Dream
The Duke Spirit
The Honey Brothers
The Knux
The Maine
The Roots
The Used
The Von Bondies
The White Tie Affair
Tim McGraw
Tom Morello
Travis Barker
Tyga
Tyler Hilton
Will.I.Am
Wiz Khalifa
Wyclef
Your Vegas